New Technology Revolutionizing Bodywork and Rolfing® Part 2: Manual Therapy vs TECAR vs Laser
Blog Summary: Studies have shown that 30-50% of sports injuries are soft tissue-related, with muscle injuries being the primary cause of physical disability. Combining manual therapy with new technologies like TECAR (Capacitive and Resistive Electrical Transfer) and Laser Therapy can enhance muscle recovery and reduce rehabilitation time. Integrating all three—manual therapy, TECAR, and Laser—optimizes muscle recovery for better outcomes.
Manual Therapy vs TECAR vs Laser
Manual therapy, including techniques like myofascial release and deep tissue massage, is an essential part of muscle recovery. The addition of TECAR therapy, which uses high-frequency electric currents for deep thermotherapy, accelerates recovery by increasing blood circulation and reducing muscle spasms. Laser therapy, a non-invasive treatment, promotes healing with anti-inflammatory effects and enhanced microcirculation.
The Benefits of Manual Therapy in Muscle Disorder Treatment
Manual therapy involves hands-on techniques like massage therapy, joint mobilization, and myofascial release to treat muscle imbalances. This therapy improves flexibility and reduces discomfort by manipulating connective tissue, including fascia. Though manual therapy has been used for centuries, it continues to be a key treatment method for chronic pain and musculoskeletal disorders.
The Benefits of Laser Therapy in Muscle Disorders
Laser therapy uses high-energy light to penetrate deep tissues, reducing edema and inflammation, improving circulation, and promoting healing. Its non-invasive nature makes it ideal for treating conditions like fibromyalgia, TMJ, and muscle pain, offering immediate pain relief and long-lasting benefits.
The Benefits of TECAR Therapy in Muscle Disorders
TECAR therapy, based on radiofrequency energy, enhances the body's natural healing processes by increasing blood circulation, reducing muscle spasms, and accelerating cellular metabolism. This therapy is particularly effective in treating deep tissues and aiding recovery from injuries or dysfunctions in muscles, joints, and tendons. The combination of manual therapy and TECAR is considered one of the most effective treatment approaches for muscle recovery, as it combines the therapeutic benefits of soft tissue manipulation with deep thermotherapy.
Manual Therapy: Manual therapy remains one of the foundational treatments in physical therapy, combining techniques such as myofascial release, massage therapy, and trigger point therapy to release tension in the fascia and improve body alignment. This holistic approach addresses areas like back pain and muscle tension, ensuring the entire body benefits from improved mobility and reduced soreness.
Laser Therapy: Laser therapy promotes pain relief by stimulating the body’s natural healing processes, including the production of ATP, essential for tissue regeneration. It's beneficial for conditions such as chronic pain, arthritis, and sports injuries. Though laser treatment is quick and effective, it’s most powerful when paired with manual therapy or TECAR therapy for optimal recovery.
TECAR Therapy: TECAR therapy, a form of electrotherapy, uses high-frequency currents to treat musculoskeletal pain, reduce inflammation, and promote the healing of soft tissue. By targeting both superficial and deep tissues, TECAR helps alleviate discomfort from muscle tension, adhesions, and fascial restrictions, making it a valuable tool for physical therapists and massage therapists alike.
Combining Modalities for Faster Recovery
While each therapy offers unique benefits, their combined use is key to optimizing muscle recovery. Manual therapy, TECAR, and laser work synergistically, addressing both the surface and deeper layers of the body’s tissues. Whether you're dealing with myofascial pain, chronic back pain, or recovery after a sports injury, integrating these treatments can accelerate healing, improve flexibility, and restore balance to the body.
The introduction of new technologies such as TECAR and Laser Therapy is revolutionizing the way we approach bodywork. For those dealing with muscle pain, soft tissue injuries, or chronic pain, these advanced therapies, along with traditional manual therapy, offer a powerful toolkit for achieving optimal recovery and enhanced well-being.
References
Elias, G.P.; Varley, M.C.; Wyckelsma, V.L.; McKenna, M.J.; Minahan, C.L.; Aughey, R.J. Effects of water immersion on post training recovery in Australian footballers. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2012, 7, 357–366.
Leeder, J.; Gissane, C.; van Someren, K.; Gregson, W.; Howatson, G. Cold water immersion and recovery from strenuous exercise: A meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2012, 46, 233–240.
Osti, R.; Pari, C.; Salvatori, G.; Massari, L. Tri-length laser therapy associated to TECAR therapy in the treatment of low-back pain in adults: A preliminary report of a prospective case series. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 407–412.
Pereira, W.M.; Ferreira, L.A.; Rossi, L.P.; Kerpers, I.I.; Grecco, S.L.A.; de Paula, A.R.J.; Oliveira, C.S. Influence of heat on fatigue and electromyographic activity of the biceps brachii muscle. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2011, 15, 478–484.
Hayashi, K.; Arai, Y.C.; Ikemoto, T.; Nishihara, M.; Suzuki, S.; Hirakawa, T.; Matsuo, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Haruta, M.; Kawabata, Y.; et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain at the first multidisciplinary pain center of Japan. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 2901–2905.
Alayat, M.S.; Atya, A.M.; Ali, M.M.; Shosha, T.M. Long-term effect of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain: A randomised blinded placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 1065–1073.
Pillastrini, P.; Gardenghi, I.; Bonetti, F.; Capra, F.; Guccione, A.; Mugnai, R.; Violante, F.S. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for chronic low back pain management in primary care. Jt. Bone Spine 2012, 79, 176–185.
Hernández-Bule, M.L.; Paíno, C.L.; Trillo, M.Á.; Úbeda, A. Electric stimulation at 448 kHz promotes proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 34, 1741–1755.
Kato, S.; Saitoh, Y.; Miwa, N. Repressive effects of a capacitive-resistive electric transfer (CRet) hyperthermic apparatus combined with provitamin C on intracellular lipid-droplets formation in adipocytes. Int. J. Hyperth. 2013, 29, 30–37.
Cheng, H.; Huang, Y.; Yue, H.; Fan, Y. Electrical Stimulation Promotes Stem Cell Neural Differentiation in Tissue Engineering. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 6697574.
Oostendorp, R.A.B. Credibility of manual therapy is at stake “Where do we go from here?”. J. Man Manip. Ther. 2018, 26, 189–192.
Reid, D.; Cook, C.; Sizer, P.S. Is orthopedic manipulative physical therapy not fashionable anymore? Lessons learned from 2016 IFOMPT meeting and future directions. J. Man Manip. Ther. 2017, 25, 1–2.
Babatunde, O.O.; Jordan, J.L.; Van der Windt, D.A.; Hill, J.C.; Foster, N.E.; Protheroe, J. Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic overview of current evidence. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178621.
Kim, G.J.; Choi, J.; Lee, S.; Jeon, C.; Lee, K. The effects of high intensity laser therapy on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 3197–3199.
Conforti, M.; Fachinetti, G.P. High power laser therapy treatment compared to simple segmental physical rehabilitation in whiplash injuries (1° and 2° grade of the Quebec Task Force classification) involving muscles and ligaments. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013, 3, 106–111.
Ezzati, K.; Fekrazad, R.; Raoufi, Z. The effects of photo-biomodulation therapy on post-surgical pain. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 10, 79–85.
